Dating a relative

Further, there is no material in Austin's book which legitimizes the false and misleading claims in his articles (which are free and available online) receive much wider distribution than Austin's book (which costs ).

Dose saturation represents a fundamental limitation for obtaining finite optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) quartz ages over Middle Pleistocene timescales.

If it is not the flows' age, that is not a "problem" with isochron dating, and it is not relevant to the large number of Rb/Sr isochrons which were computed from mineral separations of a single object.

It also be the age of the flows, but it does not have to be.An angular unconformity is the result of tilting and eroding of the lower layers before the upper ones are deposited.These tilted and eroded layers are Precambrian in age (blue in Figure 1, above).The attempt to abuse the meaning of a single contrived date -- which was produced only by a sample selection geared to dating a different event, and only for samples whose results were known by Austin in advance -- says a lot more about the level of competence or honesty in this creation "science" research program, than it says about the validity of isochron dating methods.Even if given credit for discovering this case (which he clearly doesn't deserve, as his use of Leeman's data proves), Austin has only managed to "call into question" a particular sampling technique.

Leave a Reply